New Disclosures Reveal Clinton Cashed In Big From Qatari Government No rating results yet

By:  Jordon Schachtel

New Discllosures Reveal Clinton Cashed In For $500K to $1 Million From Qatari Government For two Speeches

The Clinton Foundation disclosed approximately $26.4 million dollars in donations Thursday that had previously been withheld from having any oversight by public entities.

Among the most alarming findings in the new disclosures was that former President Bill Clinton had been paid between $500,000 to $1,000,000 dollars by the government of Qatar to deliver two separate speeches.

Like the articles you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from TapWires.com,  When The Truth Matters

Clinton raked in an estimated $250,000 to $500,000 from a speech for the U.S. Islamic World Forum, an outfit of the left-wing Brookings Institute that is funded wholly by the oil sheikhs in Doha.

In another speech, the Qatar First Investment Bank, which is run by the Qatari government (and offers Shariah-compliant banking), paid Mr. Clinton between $250,000 and $500,000 for another speech, the Washington Post reported.

Before the most recent round of disclosures, estimates had stated that the Clinton Foundation had received somewhere between $1 million and $5 million from the Qatari government, according to reports.

Although Qatar is officially an ally of the United States, its government has often openly engaged in troubling acts, such as bankrolling the Muslim Brotherhood, Palestinian terror group Hamas, and funding the Al Qaeda-affiliated Al Nusra front.

The new revelations concerning the Clinton Foundation’s large donations from Qatar comes at the same time the Gulf State has been harshly criticized for its internal human rights abuses. If the situation for migrant workers does not improve within the country, Qatar may be on the verge of losing its 2022 World Cup bid, according to reports.

The heat put forward on the Clinton Foundation to become more transparent with its finances comes following the publication of the new book Clinton Cash, written by Breitbart’s Senior Editor-at-Large, Peter Schweizer.

Read More: Breitbart.com

More Must Read Stories:
Huey P. Long Lives Again – In South Dakota – The Targeting Of Dr. Annette Bosworth
Terrorist Posing As Refugee Nabbed By Cops
Queerly Beloved: Father To “Marry” Son With Courts Blessing
Barney Frank Confirms: No Congressional Oversight of Clinton Cash Uranium Deal
Conservatives Blame GOP Leaders For Not Stopping ‘Fundamental Transformation of America’
Editor’s Choice 
Contrary To Obama Speak: ISIS Leader Says, “Islam Is The Religion Of War

Please rate this

Dzhokhar Tsarnaevs’ Mother Warns USA Will Burn In “Eternal and Terrifying Fire” 5/5 (1)

By: Warner Todd Huston

After her terrorist son was sentenced to death for his part in the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s mother warned that Allah would burn the USA in an “eternal and terrifying fire.”

On Friday, May 15, the younger Tsarnaev was sentenced to death despite his defense team attempting to persuade the court to believe that Dzhokhar was just a “kid” who was swept up into terrorism by a domineering older brother.

Zubeidat Tsarnaeva, the mother of the two Boston Marathon bombing suspects, said in this 2013 file photo that authorities were wrong to suspect her sons of the bombings. Her husband, Anzor Tsarnaev, is beside her. (Associated Press) ** FILE **

 

 

 

 

 

Now Dzhokhar’s mother, Zubediat Tsarnaeva, is lashing out via a texting app saying that she hopes the United States burns in an “eternal and terrifying fire.”

“They think that they are killing us and they celebrate this, but we are the ones who will rejoice when Allah grants us the chance to behold them in the flames of an eternal and terrifying fire, an otherworldly flame,” Tsarnaeva said in a message to a friend.

The messages were discovered on a Vocativ.com page set up by supporters of the woman’s now-convicted and condemned son.

Read More: Breitbart.com

More Must Read Stories:
Huey P. Long Lives Again – In South Dakota – The Targeting Of Dr. Annette Bosworth
Terrorist Posing As Refugee Nabbed By Cops
Queerly Beloved: Father To “Marry” Son With Courts Blessing
Barney Frank Confirms: No Congressional Oversight of Clinton Cash Uranium Deal
Conservatives Blame GOP Leaders For Not Stopping ‘Fundamental Transformation of America’
Editor’s Choice
Contrary To Obama Speak: ISIS Leader Says, “Islam Is The Religion Of War

Please rate this

Hillary Clinton Less Popular Now Than At Any Time Since 2008 No rating results yet

By: William Bigelow

Apparently, Hillary Clinton is least popular among the American public when she runs for president.

In a poll from the Pew Research Center, Clinton’s “favorability” has plunged to 49 percent, the lowest it has been since 2008, when she mounted her unsuccessful run for the White House and her rating sat at 48 percent. 47 percent of respondents had an unfavorable opinion of her in the new poll.

Like the articles you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from TapWires.com,  When The Truth Matters

Clinton polled at a 66 percent favorability rating in November 2009 when she was secretary of state, but her approval rating has dropped steadily ever since. Between last August and the new poll, Clinton’s approval rating sagged equally among Democrats and Republicans: 86 percent of Democrats approved of her last August, compared to 77 percent now, and 27 percent of GOP voters approved of her then, as opposed to 17 percent currently.

Among Democrats, Clinton’s favorability rating was poorest with Millennials (ages 18-25) at 65 percent; 79 percent of Democrats ages 26-34 approve of her; 82 percent of Gen Xers, 76 percent of Boomers, and 79 percent of Silents approved.

Read More: Breitbart.com

More Must Read Stories:
Huey P. Long Lives Again – In South Dakota – The Targeting Of Dr. Annette Bosworth
Terrorist Posing As Refugee Nabbed By Cops
Queerly Beloved: Father To “Marry” Son With Courts Blessing
Barney Frank Confirms: No Congressional Oversight of Clinton Cash Uranium Deal
Conservatives Blame GOP Leaders For Not Stopping ‘Fundamental Transformation of America’
 Editor’s Choice 
Contrary To Obama Speak: ISIS Leader Says, “Islam Is The Religion Of War

Please rate this

Exclusive Updated: Huey P. Long Lives Again – In South Dakota – The Targeting Of Dr. Annette Bosworth 5/5 (1)

By Dr. Peter Waldron

No Compromise Group
2601 S. Minnesota Avenue STE 105-265
Sioux Falls, SD 57105-4750

The Doctor Annette Bosworth Story

As you are reading this article, Dr. Annette Bosworth is on trial in Pierre, South Dakota. She’s facing 24 years in prison for 12 felony counts related to charges of voter petition perjury.

If that sentence sounds harsh, consider this: this wasn’t a case of election fraud with lists of fake or dead voters. No, all the petition signatures that Bosworth is facing jail time for were real, legitimate supporters of hers.

What’s happening in South Dakota?


Bosworth’s story shows the perils citizens can face taking on a corrupt political system in the current political climate of no-holds-barred personal destruction.

Dr. Bosworth is a native of South Dakota, the home of Mount Rushmore, but also consistently ranked as one of America’s most corrupt states. The Godfearing, conservative population has overwhelmingly elected Republicans for over 150 years, which has led to an imbalanced, one party ruled state government political machine fueled by rampant cronyism, no-bid contracts and dependence on Federal dollars.

Bosworth went to medical school, then did her internship and got her first job as a doctor in Utah. Along the way, she also had three sons with her husband Chad. Dr. Bosworth became an expert in areas like addiction treatment and the use of electronic medical records. Soon, she was lured back to South Dakota to work for one of the big hospitals there.

There was a clash with the new job’s establishment, Bosworth’s focus on patient-care led to conflicts with a medical system that rewarded doctors whose prescribing patterns rewarded insurance companies.

Bosworth’s goal was getting the best results for her patients, not feeding the insurance industry’s bottom line.

Bosworth began working with a local shelter and helping Native American children. She saved the shelter hundreds of thousands of dollars a month, which cut down on the profits of the big hospital. That’s when the medical establishment had had enough of Dr. Bosworth: the Attorney General went after her medical license.

With her livelihood threatened, Bosworth got a harsh lesson in the political reality of South Dakota. The state is #4 per capita in the entire United States in getting outside Federal dollars, and much of that money is due to the Department of Social Services policies about placing Native American children into foster case.

The steps the state of South Dakota takes to remove these children are outrageous: a recent court ruling found that hundreds of children had been taken in unconstitutional hearings that also violated Federal Indian Child Welfare Act law. Anyone or anything that threatens the South Dakota Department of Social Services cash cow risks getting crushed by the political machine.

The Attorney General’s ginned up case to take Bosworth’s medical license failed but Bosworth’s glimpse into the real dangers of power in the state gave her the desire to get involved in politics for the first time. She saw things needed changing in South Dakota’s corrupt political culture.

With Jimmy Stewart optimism, Bosworth decided to run for the U.S. Senate as a political newcomer. With her family by her side and making a pledge to reverse the problems in America’s health care system, Dr. Annette Bosworth announced her candidacy as a Republican in 2013.  She had no idea how how visious, even malevolent the political establishment of South Dakota really was.  It is as if South Dakota has stepped back in to the circa 1930 and the tyranny of Huey P Long’s Louisiana. She would soon feel the full weight of organized evil focused directly on her.

Bosworth’s biggest primary opponent was career politician and former South Dakota Governor Mike Rounds. It was Gov. Rounds who had originally appointed Marty Jackley, the Attorney General who had tried and failed to take Dr. Bosworth’s medical license.

Although she was a long-shot to win, Bosworth had a quiet strategy that had been suggested to her by former Gov. Bill Jankelow: pursue the vote of a devout religious sect in South Dakota called the Hutterites.

The Hutterites are peaceful, hardworking communal, Christian people, living on hundreds of scattered colonies throughout the prairies. Because they are communal, they tend to vote as a bloc but few politicians seek their votes. Bosworth had a natural connection: she was widely respected among the Hutterites for her work as as a doctor who would often drive hours to visit their remote colonies and tend to their medical needs.

At first, Bosworth’s campaign was viewed as no threat to the Mike Rounds campaign, who had the backing of establishment group like Washington D.C.’s powerful National Republican Senatorial Committee.  Rounds raised big bucks from major donors but in the first quarter of 2013, something shocking happened . . .

The 1st Quarter shocker?  Dr. Annette Bosworth had raised more money than Mike Rounds.

While other primary opponents had only raised a few thousand dollars, Mike Rounds was a fundraising juggernaut, pulling in a quarter of a million dollars in that first quarter alone while spending about $100,000 more than he brought in…and Bosworth had beaten him by a couple of hundred thousand dollars while keeping her cash flow in the black. Worse for Rounds, Bosworth’s fundraising was small donor money…which meant she was getting grassroots support from across the country.

With just months before the primary, Dr Annette Bosworth was suddenly a very real threat to the Rounds campaign. The Rounds team tried to spin the fundraising news, but they knew they were in trouble.

That’s when the South Dakota political machine’s long knives came out against Annette Bosworth.

Suddenly, a spate of negative stories and wild accusations began appearing everywhere in the South Dakota media and on the political blogs. Bosworth was being called everything from mentally ill to a criminal and the lapdog South Dakota media didn’t bother to get Bosworth’s side of the story or even do basic fact checking.

Worse, it appears that Bosworth had two traitors in her midst; political operatives with long standing connections to the political machine in South Dakota. These mercenaries charged the Bosworth campaign handsome fees but had questionable loyalties and gave her the advice that would end up leading the petition perjury charges.

The Rounds political team was apparently tipped off to the Hutterite strategy, because weeks before the primary election, Attorney General Marty Jackley helped tip the election by making public allusions about possible petition fraud charges against Bosworth…and began raids and interrogations at Hutterite colonies.

Jackley’s Division of Criminal Investigation agents and local sheriff began showing up and questioning Hutterites with the primary just weeks away. Even though the Hutterites told Jackley and police that Bosworth has never once asked them to do anything illegal, the impact on the quiet, reclusive colonies was immediate: they decided not to vote at all in the primary.

Meanwhile, one of the Benedict Arnolds on the Bosworth team publicly promoted a fundraiser for Attorney General Marty Jackley hosted by Bosworth opponent Mike Rounds.

By the time of the June primary, the Bosworth campaign and her personal reputation were in tatters from the media barrage and intimidation of her supporters. Meanwhile, the media gave no coverage at all to the numerous scandals surrounding Rounds.

On Election Day, Bosworth ended up with 6% of the vote. Given the tactics used against her, it’s a wonder that she got any votes at all.

The day of the election, Attorney General Marty Jackley filed charges against Bosworth.

Even though she’s facing the harshest penalty ever considered in U.S. history for petition related issues, the real goal of finding felony charges is plain: if convicted of a felony, Dr. Annette Bosworth will lose her medical license.

More Must Read Stories:
Push To Court Martial General For Thanking God – At A National Day of Prayer Task Force
ISIS Sacks Iraqi City of Ramadi
Obama Administration Chides Networks – Stop Using Footage Of ISIL Columns
‘We Are on Your Streets’ – ISIS Cells Claim to Be in Rome
Schlafly: ‘Gay Marriage’ Advocates Want To ‘Wipe Out’ Christianity
Editor’s Choice 
Contrary To Obama Speak: ISIS Leader Says, “Islam Is The Religion Of War

Please rate this

Terrorist Posing As Refugee Nabbed By Cops No rating results yet

By: Leo Hohmann

Italian police arrested a North African man they say helped plan the March 18 terrorist attack on a museum that killed 21 tourists and a police officer, and the man arrived in Italy on a boat posing as a refugee.

Police arrested 22-year old Abdelmajid Touil, who faces terrorism and murder charges for his alleged involvement in planning the attack on the National Bardo Museum in Tunisia.

Touil, a Muslim, had arrived in Sicily aboard a boat with 90 other migrants one month before the attack, according to a Milan police official.

Like the articles you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from TapWires.com,  When The Truth Matters

Abdelmajid TouilAbdelmajid Touil

Tunisian authorities have already arrested more than 20 others accused of carrying out the massacre. A terrorist group affiliated with the Islamic State, also called ISIS, claimed responsibility for the attack. A five-minute audio message posted on YouTube in the name of Jund al-Khilafah, or Soldiers of the Caliphate, threatened Tunisian politicians, including the country’s president and prime minister, Voice of America reported.

Tunisia has witnessed a surge in Islamic terrorism with the assassination of two secular politicians in the last two years as the violent fallout continues from the so-called “Arab Spring.”

Italian investigators said Touil reached Sicily on a boat Feb. 17 and his mother and two brothers had been living legally in Italy for years, according to a report in the Sydney Morning Herald.

Italy’s policy of welcoming the boat people from North Africa is increasingly a subject of fierce debate, similar to debates in the U.S. about whether to accept increasing numbers of Muslim refugees fleeing civil war and unrest in Syria and Somalia — two countries that contain high numbers of jihadists.

Prime Minister Matteo Renzi of Italy praised the arrest Wednesday, but politicians on the right criticized his government’s failure to stop migrant boats from reaching Italy. They have been arrived at a rate of about 6,000 per month since last fall, most of them crossing the Mediterranean from Libya.

Matteo Salvini, leader of Italy’s anti-immigrant Northern League, cited the “long-denounced danger” of terrorism suspects reaching Europe aboard migrant boats and called for the authorities to try harder to thwart departures from North Africa, the Morning Herald reported.

In a statement, Mariastella Gelmini, one of the national leaders of the center-right party Forza Italia, said: “It is now clear that extremist terrorists use our country as a logistical base. We need strong action, also after the uncertainties of many European countries. We need to immediately stop the landings in Italy.”

Hundreds of Muslim migrants land in Italy every day, coming from Libya. ISIS has promised to infiltrate the refugees but Italy’s government continues to take them in under pressure from leftist community organizers and resettlement agencies.
Hundreds of Muslim migrants land in Italy every day, coming from Libya. ISIS has promised to infiltrate the refugees but Italy’s government continues to take them in under pressure from leftist community organizers and resettlement agencies.
Italy’s interior minister, Angelino Alfano, has repeatedly said Italian intelligence services “had no evidence that terrorists tried to reach Europe on migrant boat,” the Morning Herald reported. On Wednesday, he praised the work of the Italian police.

Several other politicians on the left said terrorists could take easier and less perilous routes to Italy than the overcrowded migrant boats that leave Libya and often call for help from the Italian coast guard while in transit.

Regardless of the mode of transportation, ISIS operatives have openly bragged on social media that they will infiltrate the refugee ranks to penetrate Western Europe and the U.S.

Italy becoming ‘useful platform’ for terrorists?

According to the International Organization for Migration, almost 39,000 people have arrived in Italy in the first five-and-a-half months of 2015, compared to more than 41,000 in 2014.

The Voice of America also reported the fact that a jihadist managed to enter Italy and mingle with migrants who landed on the Italian island of Sicily is causing consternation in Rome and has prompted an outcry from anti-immigration politicians. The head of the Northern League party, Matteo Salvini, is calling for the suspension of the Schengen agreement that allows people to move freely across most European Union state borders without passport and customs checks.

“Libyan intelligence says boats are arriving with Islamic State terrorists,” Salvini said on Italian television. “Today in my Milan, a north African was arrested for involvement in the Tunisian massacre. Close the borders before it’s too late.”

Daniela Santanchèa, a lawmaker from former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s Forza Italia party, accused Italy’s left-wing government of failing to protect the country, according to the VOA report. He said it was “unbelievable that this government, instead of defending us from cut-throats, has transformed Italy into a useful platform for terrorists.”

U.S. has its own problem with terrorist refugees

The U.S. takes in more refugees than any other country at about 70,000 per year. Most are assigned by the United Nations. And there have been a number of high-profile arrests of refugees from Somalia over the past year, many of them charged with providing material support to terrorist organizations, while others have left the country to fight for terrorist groups including ISIS and al-Shabab.

The next big wave of refugees coming to America is from Syria.

The U.S. has already accepted several hundred Syrians this year and the U.N. has 11,000 more in the pipeline waiting to get into America. Some refugee resettlement lobbyists, such as David Miliband of International Rescue Committee, have called upon the U.S. to take in at least 65,000 Syrians by the end of President Obama’s term in office.

The FBI has warned that it is virtually impossible to screen Syrian refugees for ties to ISIS and other Islamic terror organizations. Michael Steinbach, deputy assistant director of the FBI’s counter-terrorism unit, warned the U.S. House Homeland Security committee in February that the U.S. does not have the capability to properly vet refugees from a “failed state” like Syria, where the U.S. military does not have boots on the ground and does not have access to any reliable law enforcement records.

The House Homeland Security Committee was scheduled to hold another hearing issue today, May 21, but that hearing was unexpectedly postponed, Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., announced on the committee’s website.
Read more at WND.com

More Must Read Stories:
Push To Court Martial General For Thanking God – At A National Day of Prayer Task Force
ISIS Sacks Iraqi City of Ramadi
Obama Administration Chides Networks – Stop Using Footage Of ISIL Columns
‘We Are on Your Streets’ – ISIS Cells Claim to Be in Rome
Schlafly: ‘Gay Marriage’ Advocates Want To ‘Wipe Out’ Christianity
Editor’s Choice 
Contrary To Obama Speak: ISIS Leader Says, “Islam Is The Religion Of War

 

Please rate this

Queerly Beloved: Father To “Marry” Son With Courts Blessing No rating results yet

Source: WND.com

Norman MacArthur and Bill Novak, father and son, though not biologically, will soon be husband and … whatever, reports the Patch of Bucks County, Pennsylvania.

The pair, both in their 70s, have been together for 50 years and registered in New York City as domestic partners in 1994. But when they moved to Pennsylvania, they discovered their domestic partnership wasn’t recognized, and legalized same-sex marriage was nowhere on the horizon.

Needing to take care of estate-planning issues, the pair pursued a novel legal approach. Novak adopted MacArthur in 2000. The fact their parents were deceased removed any legal objection.

“It was the only legal method we could use in Pennsylvania to give underpinning to our relationship,” MacArthur said.

When the United States District Court declared unconstitutional Pennsylvania’s marriage laws prohibiting same-sex marriage unconstitutional in 2014, Novak and MacArthur wanted to tie the knot in marriage, but their earlier legal gambit now became an obstacle. Pennsylvania law doesn’t permit marriage between parents and children.

So, a week ago, the father and son’s Petition to Vacate Adoption Decree was approved, and the pair simply became two single men now allowed to marry.

“We are ecstatic beyond belief,” MacArthur said. “I feel an enormous sense of not only relief but freedom that we can finally do something in Pennsylvania that I’ve been dreaming of for years.”

According to their lawyer, Terry Clemons, the adoption strategy was commonly used 15 to 20 years ago to facilitate estate planning and access to medical care.

The pair has been given a marriage license and is planning a summer wedding.

Read more at WND.com

More Must Read Stories:
Push To Court Martial General For Thanking God – At A National Day of Prayer Task Force
ISIS Sacks Iraqi City of Ramadi
Obama Administration Chides Networks – Stop Using Footage Of ISIL Columns
‘We Are on Your Streets’ – ISIS Cells Claim to Be in Rome
Schlafly: ‘Gay Marriage’ Advocates Want To ‘Wipe Out’ Christianity
Editor’s Choice
Contrary To Obama Speak: ISIS Leader Says, “Islam Is The Religion Of War

Please rate this

Barny Frank Confirms: No Congressional Oversight of Clinton Cash Uranium Deal No rating results yet

By: Michael Patrick Leahy

Retired Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) tells Breitbart News in an exclusive interview that while he served as chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Congress exercised no oversight over the activities of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

In 2010, during his tenure as chairman, CFIUS approved the controversial ARMZ-Uranium One transaction that gave the Russian government control of 20 percent of American uranium deposits.

The failure of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to disclose the ties between executives at Uranium One, who benefited financially from the approval of the transaction, is at the center of the conflict of interest scandals outlined in Clinton Cash, the recently released book written by Breitbart News editor-at-large Peter Schweizer.

Like the articles you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from TapWires.com,  When The Truth Matters

“There’s no way you’re going to tie me into this,” Frank tells Breitbart News.

“I didn’t have that much communication with CFIUS. I helped set up CFIUS [with the passage of Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007]. We had a request to the Bush administration that it would be good to have a procedure [to deal with foreign investments].”

Frank explained the impetus for the legislation was the controversy surrounding the 2005-2006 Dubai Ports deal.

As chairman of the House Financial Services Committee in 2010, Frank was the key person in Congress with whom CFIUS communicated. The 2007 law he helped pass authorized Congressional oversight of CFIUS actions, and in his capacity as chairman Frank was one of the members of Congress most directly responsible for CFIUS oversight.

But Frank recalls his role in that oversight process as virtually non-existent.

Breitbart News asked Frank if he recalled receiving a communication from CFIUS on October 22, 2010 when the panel approved the ARMZ-Uranium One transaction.

“I don’t remember that,” Frank tells Breitbart News. “We [Congress] had no power.”

“This [ARMZ-Uranium One transaction] never came to my attention. I don’t remember it being very controversial,” Frank says.

“The most controversial deal was somebody wanting to buy a hotel overlooking the White House,” Frank says.

“I do recall there was some debate over the economics of the [ARMZ-Uranium One] transaction,” Frank adds.

Frank also tells Breitbart News he never received a classified briefing from CFIUS.

“I never received a classified briefing from CFIUS,” Frank says. He adds that, “I was invited to one classified briefing when I was in the minority” on another topic by the Bush administration.

Frank does not recall his Republican colleagues on the committee at the time raising objections to the CFIUS approval of the ARMZ-Uranium One transaction.

“I do not remember any Republican member of the Financial Services Committee raising that issue with me,” Frank says.

“Some other committees, such as Foreign Relations or Armed Services,” Frank says, may have paid closer attention to CFIUS oversight at the time.

The portrait of Frank that emerges from the exclusive Breitbart interview is of someone totally disinterested in exercising Congressional oversight responsibilities over any CFIUS approved transactions.

Frank stated several times during the Breitbart News interview that at the time he was focused primarily on legislative solutions to pressing financial crises.

Breitbart News pointed out to Frank that when CFIUS submitted its 2010 annual report to Congress, it contained an error in its description of the ARMZ-Uranium One deal. It classified the only mining transaction of the year as one in which the acquiring company was Canadian, rather than Russian.

The only mining transaction that took place in 2010, however, was the ARMZ acquistion of controlling interest in Uranium One. While Uranium One is a Canadian company, ARMZ, the acquiring company, is Russian.

Breitbart News asked Frank if, after receiving and reviewing the 2010 CFIUS annual report, he noticed this error and asked for a correction from CFIUS.

Frank’s response is illuminating.

“First I ever heard of it,” Frank says. “I paid no attention to that [2010 CFIUS annual] report.”

On Sunday, Frank weighed in on Hillary Clinton’s role in the controversial 2010 deal that gave the Russian government control of 20 percent of America’s uranium deposits. In an article published in the Portland Press Herald, the former House Financial Services Committee Chairman did not acknowledge his own failure to lead the Congressional oversight of that deal:

Clinton is accused of supporting a policy of cooperation with Russia by helping a Russian company buy uranium. This was a policy that began under President George W. Bush and was continued by President Obama until Russia invaded Ukraine.

This “scandal” follows others, like her non-role in the murder of an American ambassador in Benghazi, Libya, and her unsuspicious use of a secure personal email account when she was secretary of state. Articles about each accusation usually include a reference to previous controversies. The intent is to make people likelier to believe the accusation du jour.

Current House Financial Services Committee Chairman Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) noted in an April 30 radio interview that Frank, the committee’s chairman in 2010, was responsible for Congressional oversight of the ARMZ-Uranium One transaction approval by CFIUS at the time. As Breitbart News reported:

“At the time,” Hensarling noted, “Barney Frank, a Democrat, was chairman of the committee. But the House Republicans protested at the time. We urged CFIUS not to approve the transaction that has led to Russia to control the lion’s share of uranium product, and as you well know, to control a fifth of the United States, our own American uranium production. So we protested at the time.”

In 2010, several Republican legislators, including Senator Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) and Representative Peter King (R-NY) objected to the ARMZ-Uranium One transaction on national security grounds. On the face of it, it seems ludicrous that an agency of the United States Government would transfer control of 20 percent of America’s uranium deposits to the Russian government, a country that can hardly be described as one of America’s closest allies.

But within the CFIUS review process, the panel saw little cause for concern, choosing to not send it to the Presidential level for a final decision, as could have under the 2007 law.

Subsequent to the deal’s final approval in 2010 by CFIUS, very little has been heard from Republicans on the topic until the recent publication of Schweizer’s Clinton Cash book and the corresponding coverage by the mainstream media, including the New York Times.

Frank also has long established ties to the Clintons. In 2008 he endorsed Hillary Clinton in her unsuccessful campaign to secure the Democratic nomination for President.

Frank’s sister, Ann Lewis, a veteran political operator, served as Bill Clinton’s Director of Communications from 1997 to 2000. She also played a key role in Hillary’s 2008 campaign.

Based on recent news reports, she may also soon start playing a role in Hillary’s 2016 campaign.

As the Daily Beast reported:

“I was with Bill de Blasio in the 2000 Senate campaign. I bumped into him several times in Ohio in 2008 when he was campaigning for Hillary,” said Ann Lewis, a longtime Clinton adviser. “And I fully expect to be campaigning with him again.”

Though former Representative Frank may believe “there’s no way you’re going to tie me into this,” if current House Financial Services Committee Chairman Hensarling chooses to hold hearings on the role of CFIUS in the 2010 ARMZ-Uranium One transaction, the degree to which Frank exercised Congressional oversight of that transaction may be one of several topics the committee addresses.

Read More: Breitbartcom.

Please rate this

The American Perspective

%d bloggers like this: